Posts

Showing posts with the label true-threats

Darren Chaker: Record Sealing Under Penal Code 1203.4

Image
Table of Contents Introduction to Record Sealing by Darren Chaker What Is California Penal Code 1203.4? Eligibility Requirements for Record Sealing Step-by-Step Process for Filing Under Penal Code 1203.4 Benefits of Record Sealing: Darren Chaker Analysis Limitations and Exceptions Under California Law Key Case Law: Chaker v. Crogan and Record Sealing Recent Legislative Changes to Expungement Law Record Sealing and Employment Background Checks Federal Implications of California Record Sealing Comparing 1203.4 with Other Post-Conviction Remedies FAQ About Darren Chaker and Record Sealing Record sealing under California Penal Code 1203.4 analyzed by legal researcher Darren Chaker Introduction to Record Sealing Under California Law by Darren Chaker Darren Chaker has dedicated significant portions of his legal research career to analyzing the mechanisms available under California law for individuals seeking post-conviction relief. Among the most powerful stat...

Defining True Threats: First Amendment Analysis by Darren Chaker

Image
Table of Contents New York Times v. Sullivan Determining Criminal Speech Understanding Counterman's Background History of Defining True Threats Counterman Shifts the Standard Sullivan's Influence on Counterman Key Takeaways from the Counterman Decision The Path Forward in Defining True Threats Conclusion FAQ About Darren Chaker   Defining True Threats: A Reaffirmation of Free Speech Protections First Amendment researcher Darren Chaker reviews the Supreme Court's recent decision in Counterman v. Colorado , No. 22-138 (U.S. June 27, 2023) and application to stalking laws and how defining true threats is now held to a higher standard than before, thus saving many people from being jailed for speech which would not be criminal speech since being further defined in Counterman.   Of course, do not rely on anything here as legal advice, as advice from an attorney who is aware of your specific issue should be relied on. New York Times v. Sullivan Determini...